NOW YOU SEE ME ----驚天魔盜團
絢麗的魔光，映射舞臺上亮麗的燈火。各個身手不凡的four?horsemen魔術師，在片頭小露身手，即已塑造非凡形象。由聰慧快舌頭Atlas，厚粉底老美女henley，稚氣快手jack，心靈捕手兼大個子meritt，在壹次被安排的偶然碰面，組成“the?four?horsemen”魔術團。憑借高超的魔術，及幕後老板Arthur?Tressler支持，horsemen魔術團旋風式地風靡全美。第壹次公開表演的主題竟是竊盜銀行，果然成功了，但不求錢財的魔術四人組，把鈔票從天而降散落到觀眾席中。第二次的公開演出，公然捅幕後老板Arthur?Tressler背後壹刀。漩渦似的疑問降頂：這四人到底為了什麽？
Brilliant?light magic,?mapping?stage?bright?lights.?All the?extraordinary skill four?horsemen?magician,in the first?small dew?skill,?which?have shaped?special?image.?The?intelligent?Atlas?quick?tongue,thick foundation?old?beauty Henley,?childish?hands?jack,?good will hunting?and?big MERITT,occasionally?meet once?arranged,?composed of "the?four?horsemen"?magic.?With his?magic,?andbehind the scenes boss?Arthur?Tressler support,?horsemen?magic?whirlwind?swept the nation.?The first?public performance?of the?theme?was the?theft?of bank,?as a success,?the magic?Quartet?but without?money,?put the money to?drop from the clouds?scattered to?the audience.?Second publicperformances,?openly?poke?behind the scenes?boss?Tressler?Arthur?knife.?Whirlpool?doubt?droptop:?the four?for what?Making
與之相抗衡的魔術師Bradley以拆穿魔術聞名，緊追著大紅人魔術四人組不放。而另壹邊則有警探Dylan和Alma追擊盜竊犯魔術四人組。身陷危機的四人組依舊我行我素，絲毫不畏警察的逼供。電影至此，主角由魔術四人組轉至警探Dylan和Alma，這大概是電影的最大敗筆。前頭雷聲大後頭雨點小的魔術四人組，由於先聲奪人，突然間被實力派Dylan和超級氣質美女Alma尬下主角身份，顯得突兀。雖然他倆和魔術師Bradley很搶鏡，可電影壹開始創造的氣勢，由於戲份安排不當而直接被挫。若電影由始至終以魔術四人組為主，或許劇情氣氛的連貫性會更好。導演如此安排可能是為了結尾的意外驚喜，可電影結束時反倒留下壹堆沒說清的疑問，如”eye”組織到底是什麽？xx為什麽能當上eye的頭目？等等等。結局爛尾，足以凸現電影的虎頭蛇尾。
Compete with?Bradley?to?expose?famous?magician?magic,?chasing?after?the magic?Quartet?go.?And the other side?is?detective Dylan?and Alma?chase?thieves?magic?quartet.?Four?crisis?still?persist in one's old ways,?by torture?does not fear the?police.?The film?so far,?lead by the?magic?Quartet?todetective Dylan?and Alma,?this is probably the biggest?flop?movies.?The?little?front?behind?themagic?Quartet,?as the?attack,?was suddenly?the strength to send?Dylan and super?temperamentbeauty Alma,?the leading role?identity,?obtrusive.?Although?they?and the magician?Bradley?lens,can be?at the beginning of the movie?to create?momentum,?because of?the improper arrangementXifen?be?contusion?directly.?If the?film?from start to finish?to magic?Quartet,?perhaps?the plot atmosphere?coherence?will be better.?Such?arrangements may be?directed?to?a surprise?ending,but?at the end of the film,?leaving a pile of?did not say clearly?the?question,?what is the?"eye"organization?Why XX can?be the head of eye?And so on and so on.?Ending?unfinished,?enough to?show?the film?cop-out.?Making
鏡頭的處理方式很趣。尤其添加魔術的魔幻神秘，更令人賞心悅目。真亦假來，假亦真，真假難辨，我想是電影虛虛實實的特色。當第三場的公開表演結束時，魔術師壹躍而墜，警探dylan直接拔槍射擊，卻目的魔術師化為印有魔術四人組肖像的假鈔，紛飛落下，謝幕般的完美離場。
Treatment of?lens?is funny.?In particular,?add the?magic?magic?and mysterious,?more?be good to hear or see.?True or false,?false is true,?false ones,?I think?the true mingled with the false?featurefilm.?When the third?field of the?public?at the end of the show,?the magician?jumped?down,?detective Dylan?directly?pulled a gun shot,?but?the purpose?is?a?magician?magic?group?portrait?of counterfeit money,?falling?down,?like?the perfect?curtain call?off.?Making
這時我已分不清什麽是真，什麽是假。真是真魔術的真，還是是電腦特效的真。混淆下已無從尋找答案，導演似乎留有壹個關鍵的殺手鐧，企圖用這壹驚喜掀起劇情高潮。可惜，敗了。
This time I?don't know?what is real,?what is false.?It is?really?magic?true,?or?is the?computer?special effects?really.?Confusion?has?no?answers,?director?seems to?have?a critical?killer,?and attempted to use?the surprise?a?plot climax.?Unfortunately,?defeated.?Making
電影題目《now?you?see?me》，傳神地演繹魔術師誘導觀眾的那壹句“now?you?see?me”，也稍有韻味地傳達：妳看得，未必是真的，哪怕妳現在正看著。
Movie title?"now?you?see?me",?vivid?interpretation of?the magician?induced?the audience?that the sentence "now?you?see?me",?also slightly?has the flavor?to convey:?you?see,?is not necessarily true,?even if?you are?looked at.?Making
結局的安排似乎是為了把這壹主題貫徹始終。可惜錯亂的細節缺個合理交待，就匆匆了結，躲在奔跑的木馬後邊，是那個霧裏看花終隔壹層的遺憾。恰如那假魔術真電腦特效的人化假鈔，似乎到了收尾階段，導演已不由分說地張狂妄為，像個撒謊小孩看著謊言快被戳破趕緊誇張地繪聲繪色演說，意圖用情緒感染氣氛。
The arrangement of the ending?seems?to?put?this one theme?throughout.?Unfortunately,?lack of?areasonable?explanation.?In detail,?and hurried?over,?hiding in the?running of the?Trojan horsebehind,?is?that?have a blurred vision.?A layer of?regret.?Just as the?fake?magic?really?computer effects?of humanization of?counterfeit money,?it seems that the?closeout,?director?Zhang Kuangwang?has been?allowing no explanation?for,?like a?child?watching?lie?lie?was?punctured?toexaggeration to?hit off?speech,?intention in?emotional?atmosphere.?Making
謎底揭曉的大boss出現，把電影降了壹個檔次。用兩三分鐘揭曉魔術四人組針對法國銀行，老板Arthur?Tressler以及最後盜竊的保險箱，缺乏條理的論述，浪費了這個驚喜。劇情裏的五光十色，也陰暗了隱藏的主線，致使後來的劇情高潮沒能達到相對的高度，這有點可惜
The answer revealed?high?boss occurs,?the film?down a notch.?In two or three minutes?the magic?at French?bank?announced?the foursome,?safe?boss?Arthur?Tressler?and?finally?theft,?lack ofcoherent?discourse,?wasted?the surprise.?The plot of the?resplendent with variegated coloration?isdark,?hidden?line,?resulting in?the later?plot climax?can't achieve?relatively high,?this is a pity